The attached article from 1922 was written by a clergyman who wished to put the point across that flappers were not really as queer as everyone liked to think that they were.
“Painting faces is no new thing except on occasion. Belles and famous beauties of the past painted for State occasions. But then it was not good form to wear paint in daylight. Now it is, apparently. That many young women now carry this to extreme is not unusual…”
Click here to read more articles about flappers.
Click here to read a FLAPPER MAGAZINE review of an anti-flapper movie.
Click here to read an article about the demise of a popular 1940s hairstyle.
KEY WORDS: Flapper Criticism 1922,Flappers Criticized 1922,What is a Flapper,Flapper Definition,Flapper Explained,Flapper Revolt 1922,Flappers vs Victorians 1922,Generation Gap 1922,Flappers and Parents 1922,Flappers and Mothers,Flapper and Clergy,Flapper v Clergy,Flapper v Entrenched Patriarchy,Flapper Magazine Article 1922,Victorian Thoughts Concerning Flappers 1922,Victorians v Flappers,Victorians vs Flappers,Victorian Values vs Flapper Culture
